Ross, Cody T., Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Seung-Yun Oh, Samuel Bowles, Bret Beheim, John Bunce, . “Correction in order to: ‘Greater wide range inequality, reduced polygyny: rethinking the fresh new polygyny threshold model’.” Log of one’s Regal People screen 15 (147): 20180752.
Sellen, Daniel W., and Daniel J. Hruschka. 2004. “Extracted-eating resource-cover polygyny in the indigenous west united states Societies on contact.” Most recent anthropology 45 (5): 707–14. Silas, Ellis. 1926. A primitive Arcadia. London: T. Fisher Unwin Ltd. Spencer, Herbert. 1876. Prices from Sociology: Vol. step one. London: Appleton.
Starkweather, Katherine Age., and you will Raymond Hames. 2012. “A study out-of Non-Classical Polyandry.” Human nature 23 (2): 149–72. Textor, Robert B. 1967. A cross-Cultural Conclusion. The Haven, CT: HRAF Push.
Light, Douglas R., and you can Michael L. Burton. 1988. “Reasons for Polygyny: Environment, Benefit, Kinship, and you will Warfare.” American anthropologist 90 (4): 871–87.
Whiting, John W. Yards. 1964. “Aftereffects of weather to the particular cultural practices.” Inside Explorations within the Cultural Anthropology: Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock, edited from the Ward Hunt Goodenough, 511–44. Nyc, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Whiting, John W. Yards., and you may Beatrice B. Whiting. 1975. “Aloofness and Closeness out-of Husbands and Spouses: A combination-Cultural Research.” Ethos step three (2): 183–207.
- New numbers come from new Ethnographic Atlas Murdock (1962–1971) as the recovered off in D-Set.org (Kirby et al. 2016) ??
- These types of figures derive from studies about Standard Get across Cultural Sample that happen to be coded by Broude and you will Greene (1985) ; these research into relationship have been recovered out of D-Lay changeable SCCS739. Of 148 societies on the Standard Cross Social Test hence Broude and Eco-friendly coded 31.1% keeps full personal choice, 17.6% have private selection that needs parental approval, 3.4% provides private possibilities which also want parental arrangement, 18.2% provides sometimes individual choice otherwise build wedding, 16.9% provides arranged relationships, however, people have the ability to object, and twelve.8% provides fully arranged matrimony.??
- The latest figures contained in this part and also in the new Shape is actually dependent to your investigation from the Standard Mix-Cultural Test (Murdock and White 1969) ; these study to the polygyny was in fact retrieved away from D-Lay changeable SCCS211. The standard Cross-Cultural Decide to try (SCCS) are a sample from 185 societies. Data throughout the SCCS including told the provided pie graph below.??
- There are just 2 polyandrous communities on SCCS.??
- Of the numerous kind of polygyny, restricted are typical, followed closely by nonsororal polygyny, and sororal polygyny.??
- A cross-kinds study of animals and you may birds M. Ember and you can Ember (1979) found that an excessive amount of lady and additionally forecast polygynous as opposed to monogamous bonding. Certain studies have maybe not discovered assistance to the sex proportion principle, but strategies away from polygyny was basically various other (Hooper 2006; Quinlan and Quinlan 2007) otherwise variable was imputed (Minocher, Duda, and you will Jaeggi 2019) .??
Regarding Peoples Affairs City Files
Individual Interactions City Files, Inc. ( HRAF ) is an international acknowledged providers in the area of cultural anthropology. The purpose will be to encourage and you can assists the fresh new get across-cultural examination of peoples society, neighborhood and you can choices previously and provide.
EHRAF Databases
- eHRAF Globe Countries
- eHRAF Archaeology
Get in touch with HRAF
- Tel: 203-764-9401
Plain old solution to sample ideas is to evaluate communities having and you will versus a traditional trait to see if new type was predict of the version within the a thought causal factor. If you find yourself for example screening can not be conducted versus variation to study, decisions in other creature kinds could possibly get highlight these theories. Definitely, we can not speak about relationship various other kinds, however, we are able to view types with many stability from inside the men-female mating and you will compare all of them with types without one stability.
In other cultures, social identification away from matrimony is founded on a successful demo months. The fresh new Guarani from South america behavior demonstration relationships, where official marriage processes is actually deferred up to after the potential groom demonstrates his viability to own marriage. Schaden and you will Lewinsohn (1962) tells us you to
People exogamy/endogamy
Of numerous anthropological accounts declaration envy one of co-spouses. ) find that within 90% of the societies with co-spouses, ethnographers report sexual and you may emotional conflict and so they end you to definitely dispute is far more-or-shorter a good common when you look at the polygynous societies. Polygynous communities seem to have responded to envy which have specific prominent heritage and you will legislation that include: having independent household and kitchens having nonsororal co-spouses, with statutes from the husbands sharing information equitably, and achieving laws getting asleep that have co-wives within the rotation (C. R. Ember, Ember, and Peregrine 2019, 245) . Provided considerable jealousy, certain anthropologists see it puzzling that polygyny can be so common (age.g., Meters. Ember (1974) ).
Are there structural products that can assist all of us take into account different separation and divorce prices? Even though some search aids the concept you to societies with matrilocal residence much more open-minded away from separation and divorce (Minturn, Grosse, and Haider 1969) , other look will not get the matchmaking for example strong when most other items is actually managed (Ackerman 1963; Pearson and you will Hendrix 1979) . Ackerman (1963) signifies that the amount that a spouse are incorporated a beneficial society’s origin framework is more predictive. Such as for instance incorporation will likely be prior to age people, or it can exists once relationships, such becoming cared for because of the an excellent ily. Ackerman (1963) finds you to definitely
Goody, Jack. 1973. “Bridewealth and you will Dowry from inside the Africa and you can Eurasia.” From inside the Bridewealth and you may Dowry, edited by Jack Goody and you may S. J. Tambiah, 1–58 kissbrides.com Klicken Sie fГјr weitere Informationen. Cambridge Documents during the Public Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press.